But I felt that a 99% solution was the right step.“ Glazer: “Ninety nine percent of the proposed laws that come before the state Legislature are not specific to an individual financial interest.Glazer acknowledged that point, but said the Legislature generally isn’t in the business of approving permits or contracts for individuals. Michelin also pointed out what she called a double standard in the law: The “pay-to-play” restrictions don’t apply to state lawmakers. Rachel Michelin, California Retailers Association president: “We have a hard enough time, I think, getting really good people to run for office, particularly local office.”.Robert Rivinius, executive director of the Family Business Association of California: “Somebody could contribute to a local official, not even realizing that eight months later they’ll need a permit and all of a sudden the people they need a vote from aren’t able to vote.”.They also say it will make it more difficult for local candidates to run for office. The industry groups suing argue that the law goes too far, creating a new legal obstacle course that will be hard for many businesses to navigate. County, where a local cannabis business association donated heavily to local city council members, even asking some to sign pledge cards to vote in favor of the group’s policy goals. California Common Cause Executive Director Jonathan Mehta Stein: “It’s kind of an obvious pay-to-play limitation.”Īs a cautionary tale, Stein pointed to the example of Lynwood in southeast L.A.Though Glazer’s bill got no formal opposition, it was enthusiastically backed by government transparency groups including California Common Cause. 1, any local elected official who receives more than $250 from, for instance, a trash collection company seeking a contract, a contractor seeking a building permit or a restaurant owner in search of a new license either has to recuse themselves from voting on those applications for the next year or give the money back. The new law extends those restrictions to include elected officials as well, including city council members and county supervisors. Since the early 1980s, appointees to public boards and commissions have been restricted from accepting campaign contributions from the people or groups with business before them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |